12/10/2016
Pound rallies as May favours “maximum” access to single market
Sterling drops to post-Brexit lows, FTSE hits intraday high
Elliott put the Pound’s downward spiral down to Theresa May’s ‘Hard Brexit’ strategy, in which single market membership may be sacrifice for immigration control, the UK’s oversize current account deficit and the possibility of lower interest rates.
FTSE hits record intra-day high
The FTSE has benefitted heavily from sterling’s drop rising 0.5 percent on Tuesday to a record intraday high of 7,129.83 points.
The FTSE 100 is currently trading up 0.04 percent at 7,100.24 (1332GMT).
11/10/2016
Samsung shares down after halting Note 7 production
11/10/2016
William Hill and Amaya confirm merger talks
10/10/2016
Deutsche Bank shares drop after CEO fails to agree deal with US
Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBK) shares fell in early trade on Monday after reports that its CEO had failed to agree a deal with US Department of Justice to lower their $14 billion fine.
Chief executive John Cryan was in the US over the weekend for the autumn meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, with many hoping he would agree a new figure for the bank’s fine with the US authorities whilst he was there. However, it has been reported that no new deal was made.
The bank was handed the fine back in September for its part in causing the 2008 financial crisis. It is the largest fine awarded so far, causing Deutsche Bank shares to drop dramatically since on worries that the bank will be unable to pay it.
The lender was the biggest faller on Germany’s main stock market in early trading but has since regained some ground, currently trading down 0.83 percent at 12.19 (1248GMT).
Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets, told the BBC: “Deutsche Bank hasn’t as yet been able to come to any agreement with the US Justice Department as it looks to overcome the hurdle of the prospect of a rather large fine. “Talks are continuing while the bank looks at potentially spinning off a stake in its asset management division in order to free up some extra capital.”Snapchat working on $25 billion IPO
Snapchat’s parent company is considering listing the company on the stock market, in an Initial Public Offering valuing the app at $25 billion.
This would be the largest share sale on the US stock exchange since 2014, when Chinese company Alibaba was first listed at a value of $168 million.
The app has quickly come to dominate the social media world, having been used by various high-profile celebrities and companies alike. Snapchat reportedly has over 150 million users, with 10 billion videos being viewed daily on the App. The company is projected to generate $366.7m in global advertising revenue, according to data.
The app was founded by Evan Spiegel, Bobby Murphy and Reggie Brown in 2011, and has steadily gained popularity. CEO and founder Evan Spiegel, who is reportedly worth $2.1 billion, recently renamed the company ‘Snap’ to reflect the expanding components of the business.
Spiegel rejected a previous bid from social media giant Facebook earlier last year, with Facebook going on to acquire photo-sharing platform Instagram instead. Instagram have been since criticised for recent updates to the App which allowed users to post public videos, in a similar fashion to Snapchat.
The company is preparing to float in March 2017, according to a report released by the Wall Street Journal. The IPO valuation of $25 billion is a significant increase on the May funding evaluation of $17.8 billion, after which Snapchat attracted various new investors. Among these was Sequoia Capital, a venture capital firm which has invested in several other tech businesses including YouTube, Google, Oracle and Yahoo.
In September, Snap Inc introduced plans to expand the business through the launch of Spectacles. Spectacles, are pitched as glasses that are able to record ten second clips which can then be sent to smartphone devices via Bluetooth. The glasses are expected to be released prior to Christmas and retail for $130 (£100).
What would a Clinton victory mean for the financial markets?
Greater certainty
If there’s one thing the financial markets hate, it’s uncertainty. In an environment constantly pulled between fear and greed, uncertainty generally causes investors to navigate toward risk-aversion. This has all kinds of nasty side effects on the value of assets. As we mentioned at the outset, Clinton is an establishment candidate who is less likely to rock the political boat. Wall Street knows the establishment type, and would much rather play ball with a candidate they know how to deal with.No Donald Trump
In practical terms, a Hillary Clinton victory also means Donald Trump doesn’t make it to the White House. For Wall Street, who are predominantly in favour of a Clinton presidency, and the financial markets, this would be viewed as a very good thing. Do we need to take position on this?Historically, markets love Democrats
Another cold hard fact about putting a Democrat in the White House is the market performs much better. Now, we’re not saying this is solely attributed to Democrats – after all, presidents spend a great deal of time dealing with the policies of past administrations. But if we look at average stock market returns under Democrats and Republicans, it’s no contest who the market prefers. Since 1900, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has generated an average annual return of 7% under Democrats versus just 3% under Republicans. That’s a total of 19 presidents, so the sample size is fairly large.But what about the downsides of a Clinton victory?
Pharmaceutical stocks
Clinton has made lowering prescription drug costs one of her biggest election issues, and has repeatedly lashed out at the absurd costs of prescription drugs. While this is certainly a noble effort, it has wreaked havoc on the healthcare sector in general and pharmaceutical industry in particular. One thing is clear: A Clinton presidency could be detrimental to pharmaceutical stocks. If you’re an investor, you may have to rethink your portfolio. Let’s also not forget to mention that her plan for lowering drug costs has come under attack by the pharmaceutical industry. This could get ugly in a hurry.Very hawkish
Hillary Clinton may become the first female president in US history, and although it may be easy to project the maternal stereotype on the 68-year old Clinton, she is widely considered to be a war hawk. “Hillary the Hawk,” as she is sometimes called, has a woeful record when it comes to foreign policy. The Democratic hopeful voted in favour of the 2003 Iraq War, the 2009 Afghanistan surge, intervention in Libya to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi and arming rebels in their siege of Syria (the same rebels who would form part of ISIS) – and that’s only the tip of the iceberg. Another Clinton in the White House might not be good for the country’s finances.Not a change agent
If there’s one thing Americans are craving, it’s change – serious change. And if significant change is what you’re looking for, Hillary is probably the wrong candidate. For investors, a lack of change probably equates to stability for a short while, until voters demand somebody much more radical. Another four years of status quo policies, doing Wall Street’s dirty work and preparing for a cushy retirement earning $250,000 for 20 minute talks could create a new appetite for change. Who knows what types of candidates that might produce in 2020 – but we have a sneaking suspicion that they could make Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders look like one of the guys.Content sponsored by easymarkets.com
BREAKING: September US jobs figures weaker than expected
House prices weakened in three months to September – Halifax
Sterling down 10 percent in Asian “flash crash”
07/10/2016
