At the current time, every market moving event seems to start with a pronouncement from US President, Donald Trump. His desire to bring an end to the war in Ukraine and the associated cessation of US military aid, is likely to re-write the European defence architecture, with European countries having to make significant increases to their defence spending.
In Germany, the incoming government of Friedrich Merz responded by announcing a relaxation of the country’s so called ‘debt brake’, thereby freeing up significant resources for increased defence and infrastructure spending. The total stimulus to the European economy could be in the order of €800 billion and is therefore significant1. European bond yields rose in response to the prospect of higher borrowing, although European stock markets also initially greeted this development positively.
Self-inflicted economic harm
So called Liberation Day has come and gone, with Trump announcing swingeing tariffs on imported goods, ranging initially between 10% and 50%. The overall level of tariffs on goods imported into the US is set to rise to its highest level since the Smoot-Hawley Tariff act of 19302. This is likely to have profound consequences for both the American and global economy and we could therefore be witnessing the greatest act of self-inflicted economic harm in recent times. In the first week of April, stock markets reacted extremely badly to this news, being led down by those companies that are likely to be most exposed to the resulting fall out, such as auto manufacturers and banks.
Since the initial Liberation Day announcements, the situation has continued to evolve rapidly and unpredictably. America’s tariff stance has become significantly more nuanced at a country and product level. Certain consumer goods, such as smartphones and laptops, have been granted temporary exemptions. Meanwhile, there has been a partial pause on the introduction of wider tariffs, particularly for countries that have shown a willingness to engage in negotiations. By contrast, the US has taken a particularly tough stance towards China, with proposed tariffs on some imports rising as high as 145%. This has been met with a firm response from Beijing, including retaliatory measures. Markets have rallied from their lows, but sentiment remains fragile, and the outlook is highly sensitive to further political developments.
The President has invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 as cover for the introduction of these tariffs. This act was originally established to allow a US president to act quickly in a war like situation and was clearly not designed to be gamed in the way that it is today. Whilst bypassing Congress in this way is certainly unconstitutional, some would argue that it is also illegal. It is maybe not an exaggeration to say therefore that the US faces a constitutional crisis, and it is possible, and maybe even probable, that Congress will step in to re-exert control in the coming weeks.
Even if nothing changes and the currently proposed tariffs are adopted in full, the economic fallout may be so great that the Republican Congressmen could come under pressure from their constituents to rein in the President. Failing that and in the event of an economic slowdown, they would likely suffer terribly at the mid-term elections in eighteen months’ time and possibly lose control of both houses of Congress. Confidence in the current administration was falling even before the tariff announcement – it is now tanking.
At the time of writing, it is impossible to know the extent to which these tariffs will ultimately be enforced or their durability once imposed. Even if we could, the degree to which they may negatively affect the global economy cannot be predicted. All we can say for sure is that the risk of a global recession has markedly increased in recent days. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that even prior to the tariff announcement, inflation measures were remaining some way above target, with the Federal Reserve’s favourite inflation indicator showing a rise of just over 3.5% in the year to February3. US consumer confidence also recently fell to its lowest level since January 20214, raising the potential spectre of stagflation.
Sticking to our knitting
When stock markets are as volatile as they have been so far in April, there is a natural human instinct to protect ourselves and perhaps run for cover until things ‘calm down’. Each uncertain period brings its own challenges, but reacting to this instinct has historically typically resulted in lower returns than had you done nothing.
Volatility can be unsettling but is part and parcel of investing in equity markets and it is the reason why we believe the asset class delivers premium returns over time. Indeed, the savvy investor can use market volatility to his or her advantage. As Ben Graham said in his book The Intelligent Investor, “The investor who permits himself to be stampeded or unduly worried by unjustified market declines in his holdings is perversely transforming his basic advantage into a basic disadvantage.”
In our view, it is especially true that at times like these that one needs to put emotion to one side, focus on the long term and stay true to one’s investment philosophy. Our approach is and has always been to think long term and buy what we believe to be fundamentally sound businesses at a significant discount to their true economic worth, on the basis that, eventually, this economic worth will be reflected in a higher share price.
There are no guarantees of course, but in our experience, this approach has stood the test of time and, in our investing careers, has so far proved its worth through a technology bust, a global financial crisis, a Eurozone debt crisis and a global pandemic. Indeed, one of the reasons that investors in Temple Bar have enjoyed such strong returns since we began managing the trust in October 2020 is that we were able to take advantage of the market panic in the early days of the pandemic to buy some very lowly valued businesses which subsequently recovered strongly to the benefit of shareholders5.
Even though the short term is extremely uncertain, and things may well get worse before they get better, we are optimistic that this approach will remain an effective counterbalance to uncertainty, which should ultimately prove rewarding to those with the discipline to stay the course.
1 Source: Financial Times, March 2025
2 Source: Bloomberg, April 2025
3 Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), 28 February 2025
4 Source: The Conference Board, 25 March 2025
5 In the period from 31 October 2020 to 31 March 2025, Temple Bar Investment Trust is +149.9% in NAV total return terms, compared to +89.2% for the Morningstar IT UK Equity Income sector average (source: AIC / Morningstar). Past performance is not a guide to the future. The price of investments and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the full amount invested. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risks in any market environment.
Past performance is not a guide to the future. The price of investments and the income from them may fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Forecasts and estimates are based upon subjective assumptions about circumstances and events that may not yet have taken place and may never do so.
No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risks in any market environment. Nothing in this document should be construed as advice and is therefore not a recommendation to buy or sell shares. Information contained in this document should not be viewed as indicative of future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up.
This article is issued by RWC Asset Management LLP (Redwheel), in its capacity as the appointed portfolio manager to the Temple Bar Investment Trust Plc. Redwheel, is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author as of the date of publication.
Redwheel may act as investment manager or adviser, or otherwise provide services, to more than one product pursuing a similar investment strategy or focus to the product detailed in this document. Redwheel seeks to minimise any conflicts of interest, and endeavours to act at all times in accordance with its legal and regulatory obligations as well as its own policies and codes of conduct.
This document is directed only at professional, institutional, wholesale or qualified investors. The services provided by Redwheel are available only to such persons. It is not intended for distribution to and should not be relied on by any person who would qualify as a retail or individual investor in any jurisdiction or for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
The information contained herein does not constitute: (i) a binding legal agreement; (ii) legal, regulatory, tax, accounting or other advice; (iii) an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell shares in any fund, security, commodity, financial instrument or derivative linked to, or otherwise included in a portfolio managed or advised by Redwheel; or (iv) an offer to enter into any other transaction whatsoever (each a Transaction). No representations and/or warranties are made that the information contained herein is either up to date and/or accurate and is not intended to be used or relied upon by any counterparty, investor or any other third party. Redwheel bears no responsibility for your investment research and/or investment decisions and you should consult your own lawyer, accountant, tax adviser or other professional adviser before entering into any Transaction.
