AIM – Reasons to be cheerful ahead of the budget

Index over-discounting budget and interest rate concerns  

2026 seen as year of outperformance for the junior market 

  • AIM now appears to be over-discounting current budgetary and interest rate concerns.  TPI is projecting the junior index to outperform the benchmark FTSE All-Share for the whole of 2026. 
  • AIM had in fact been outperforming nicely until October, when it hit a rather unexpected ‘bump in the road’.  You may recall back at the beginning of May 2025, TPI stuck its head above the parapet with its forecast that the junior index would outperform the FTSE All-Share between then and the year end.  All was looking very good……until the wheels came off in mid-October, when it became clear that the Bank of England (‘the Bank’) had become so nervous about no. 11’s confused messaging that it was about to slam the brakes on its all-important rate-cutting cycle, leaving the market to fester as it pondered what more the Chancellor could do to impact it.  The resulting sell-off turned what had been as much as a 8% relative gain over the session into a similar loss.  In absolute terms the AIM All-Share has risen c.5.0% since 1 May 2025.  
  • Sell on the rumour, buy on the news!  Partly by design and partly by default, it now looks like AIM will in fact be a net beneficiary of the forthcoming Budget.  Widely expected to refocus on growth (to the detriment of value), Rachel Reeves is likely to offer greater certainty for unlisted securities by sustaining benefits already in place through for the Enterprise Investment Scheme (‘EIS’) and Venture Capital Trusts (‘VCT’), while scotching rumours of further restriction of Inheritance Tax (‘IHT’) Business Relief on qualifying shares (such as capping or removing it entirely).  While there remains reasonably high expectation that higher taxes will be imposed on dividends, AIM of course has never been a destination for income and so can be expected to bypass any hit taken by the other, more senior UK markets. 
  • Starting on 18 December, a series of 25bp base rate cuts (from the current 4%) look almost certain to commence once again.  This is key to confidence in AIM investment.  With the UK’s GDP growth tumbling to just 0.1% in Q3 2025 and unemployment rising to 5% (Q2 2025: 4.7%) during the same period, the Bank’s current 2026 projection of just 1.2% economic expansion is now looking a bit stretched.  So it will be forced to use the only tool it has to deliver an immediate boost to domestic confidence amid the UK’s ongoing political turmoil; as many as four more consecutive 25bp cuts could be needed to ward off a recession in 2026, with base rates even then being at a good premium to the ECB’s present Main Refinancing Operations (‘MRO’) level of 2.15%.     
  • Chartists will also be interested to note the fact that the AIM All-Share has rebounded decisively no less than ten times from the 685 (±2.5%) support level over the past 15 years, suggesting significant downside protection
FTSE AIM All-Share Data
Index Level: 737.41
Net Market Cap: £41,170m
No of Constituents: 549
52 week high/low: 796.52/624.42
Past 7-months return: 4.84%

Constituent Sizes and Yield
Ave. Market Cap: £74.58m
Medium Mk Cap: £14.00m
Largest Mk Cap: £2,608.52m
Smallest Mk Cap: <£1m
Index Yield: 1.94%

AIM All-Share – 15-year Performance Chart

AIM – Had been outperforming nicely ………until it hit a mid-October’ ‘bump in the road’ 

TPI stuck its head above the parapet back at the start of May 2025, with its forecast that AIM would outperform the FTSE All-Share between now and year end.  Analysis suggested the Index was about to emerge from the ‘perfect storm’ it had encountered since peak Pandemic, with the interest rates finally heading downwards amid expectation of an extended series of cut, while UK-focussed equity fund outflows were slowing and the halving of the inheritance tax exemption also appearing to have been just about priced in.   

AIM All-Share had Consistently Outperformed the FTSE All -Share Until Mid-October 2025  

The scenario worked well for the following 5 months, allowing the Index to chalk up relatively consistent outperformance (of almost 10% at one stage), only to then hit a ’bump in the road’ in mid-October.  This rapidly reversed AIM’s hard-won gains to now sit a similar amount below the benchmark.  This coincided with the release of cautionary UK macroeconomic data including slowing GDP growth accompanied by stubbornly high CPI, resulting in a stalling of further interest rate cuts.  With signs of sharply declining productivity, the Government’s escalating deficit will force the Chancellor to address a funding ‘gap’ estimated to be between £20 billion and £50 billion in her forthcoming budget.  Given that this is almost certain to be affected through further punitive attacks on wealth, AIM‘s overwhelming dependence on the domestic economy meant that it was no surprise when investors chose to lock-in profits to date.   

Sell on the rumour, buy on the news 

UK markets have been trading under the shadow of 26 November for some time now.  This is perfectly illustrated by nearly £7.3bn having been withdrawn from equity funds by UK-based investors since July, the largest outflow ever recorded in a four-month period.  Not surprisingly, many were seeking simply to crystalise gains prior to, or in anticipation of, the imposition of new punitive taxes from April 2026.   

UK Equity -Net Fund Flow

With such a dull picture being painted, it is not surprising that the UK continues to trade at relatively deep discounts to both the US and EU markets.  The FTSE 100, for example, is presently valued at c.13-14 times earnings, or roughly half the 22 to 27 level S&P 500 enjoys even if this can be partly explained away by its traditional sector mix weighting heavily toward financials, energy and materials as opposed to high-growth technology shares.  Since the COVID Pandemic peaked at the end of Q1 2021, AIM has tumbled by an extraordinary 67% relative to the FTSE All Share leaving it trading c.42% below its 10-year average.    

Yet, partly by design and partly by default, it looks like AIM will in fact be a net beneficiary of the forthcoming Budget.  As well as keeping current investment incentives intact, there is general expectation that the Chancellor will look for new routes to boost overall UK business investment; one such move (likely to be effective from April 2026) could be to reduce the current £20,000 allowance on cash ISAs in an effort to divert money to stock and shares ISAs instead; a further, potentially even more significant, initiative for the junior index was launched on 21 October 2025, whereby twenty of the UK’s largest pension providers and insurers (the ‘Sterling 20’, representing >90% of the UK’s active Defined Contribution scheme savers) voluntarily agreed with the government to channelling of a proportion of pension savings into unlisted UK growth opportunities (including those quoted on AIM), national infrastructure projects, etc.  The timing by which AIM might see real inflows as a result remains uncertain, although the aim is to unlock at least 5% of their main default funds (>£25bn) by 2030 for investment in areas such as affordable housing, broadband connections and scale-up finance for early-stage growing businesses. 

AIM Index Performance – A Mirror Image of UK Base Rate Moves 

The charts above demonstrate AIM’s sensitivity to UK base rate cuts.  Turner Pope projects the Bank to commence a series of four straight 25bp cuts, starting on 18 December 2025 and continuing through to the end of next year.  The Bank recently stated its view that UK CPI has probably already past its peak (having now fallen back to 3.6% in October after plateauing at 3.8% in each of the three previous months) and went on to forecast consumer prices will fall back to about 2.5% next year, before touching its 2% target during the course of 2027.  But with Q3 2025 GDP growth having tumbled to just 0.1% while UK unemployment rose to 5% (the highest since the end of the Covid pandemic) over the same period, its current projection that the economy will expand by just 1.2% in 2026 is now looking tenuous.  Various pundits are taking bets on the UK falling into recession within the coming 6 months.   So, in the absence of any unexpected new ‘shocker’ from the Chancellor just one week from now, an 18 December cut from 4.0% to 3.75% looks almost in the bag.  Assuming also that the UK’s current political turmoil continues to compound in the coming months, the Bank will be obliged to do whatever it can to maintain a slither of domestic confidence in the hope of attracting incoming investment.    

AIM – Stock picking still the key to winning   

With most of AIM’s early-stage constituents remaining cash consumers, there is a wide disparity in terms of their operational risks, market positioning and the underlying quality of their management.  This has always  

meant that passive Index investing is less effective than a rigorous, active management approach (stock picking) to identify promising companies. 

With this in mind, a tabulation has been provided below to detail the performance of a selection of the equity placings TPI has conducted for its Advised companies over the past couple of years, detailing gains registered both at the individual company’s share price peak and at its current level. 

Performance Following Recent TPI AIM Equity Placements 

Name Equity Placing Date Amount Raised (gross) Placing Price (p) Subsequent Share Price Trading High (p) %Profit/Loss from Trading High (p) Current Share Price (p) %PL on current price 
Orosur Mining Inc. Feb-24 £500k 2.95 29 883% 19.6 564% 
Avacta Group plc2 Feb-24 £25.7m 50 82 64% 83.2 66% 
N4 Pharma plc Jun-24 £630k 0.5 100% 0.63 26% 
Aptamer Group plc Jul-24 £2.83m 0.2 1.57 685% 0.90 350% 
Orosur Mining Inc. Sep-24 £835k 2.78 29 943% 19.66 607% 
Ironveld plc Oct-24 £2.5m 0.036 0.08 122% 0.05 39% 
Orosur Mining Inc. Dec-24 £1.25m 6.6 29 339% 19.6 197% 
Theracryf plc Feb-25 £4.25m 0.25 0.275 10% 0.21 -16% 
N4 Pharma plc Apr-25 £1.75m 0.4 150% 0.63 58% 
Alien Metals Ltd. May-25 £1m 0.08 0.3 275% 0.12 50% 
Metir plc Jun-25 £1.75m 0.65 1.49 129% 0.80 23% 
Ironveld plc Jun-25 £900k 0.045 0.08 78% 0.05 11% 
Zephyr Energy plc Jun-25 £10.5m 3.00 3.3 10% 2.45 -18% 
Aptamer Group plc Jul-25 £2.0m 0.3 1.57 423% 0.90 200% 
Avacta Group plc2 Jul-25 £3.25m 30 83.2 177% 83.2 177% 
Orosur Mining Inc.2 Oct-25 £10.6m 18.09 29 60% 19.6 8% 
Futura Medical plc Nov-25 £2.75m 1.7 70% 1.25 25% 

Risk Warning: Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. 

THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR TRANSMISSION INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAPAN, CANADA OR AUSTRALIA. 

Conflicts 

This is a non-independent marketing communication under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). The analyst who has prepared this report is aware that Turner Pope Investments (TPI) Limited (“TPI”) has a relationship with the company covered in this report. Accordingly, the report has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing by TPI or its clients ahead of the dissemination of investment research.  

TPI manages its conflicts in accordance with its conflict management policy. For example, TPI may provide services (including corporate finance advice) where the flow of information is restricted by a Chinese wall. Accordingly, information may be available to TPI that is not reflected in this document. TPI may have acted upon or used research recommendations before they have been published. 

Risk Warnings 

Retail clients (as defined by the rules of the FCA) must not rely on this document.  

Any opinions expressed in this document are those of TPIs research analyst. Any forecast or valuation given in this document is the theoretical result of a study of a range of possible outcomes and is not a forecast of a likely outcome or share price. 

The value of securities, particularly those of smaller companies, can fall as well as rise and may be subject to large and sudden swings. In addition, the level of marketability of smaller company securities may result in significant trading spreads and sometimes may lead to difficulties in opening and/or closing positions. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future results.  

AIM is a market designed primarily for emerging or smaller companies and the rules of this market are less demanding than those of the Official List of the UK Listing Authority; consequently, AIM investments may not be suitable for some investors. Liquidity may be lower and hence some investments may be harder to realise. 

Specific disclaimers  

This document has been produced by TPI independently.  Opinions and estimates in this document are entirely those of TPI as part of its internal research activity. TPI has no authority whatsoever to make any representation or warranty on behalf of any of the markets or indices mentioned in this report 

General disclaimers 

This document, which presents the views of TPIs research analyst, cannot be regarded as “investment research” in accordance with the FCA definition. The contents are based upon sources of information believed to be reliable but no warranty or representation, express or implied, is given as to their accuracy or completeness. Any opinion reflects TPIs judgement at the date of publication and neither TPI nor any of its directors or employees accepts any responsibility in respect of the information or recommendations contained herein which, moreover, are subject to change without notice. Any forecast or valuation given in this document is the theoretical result of a study of a range of possible outcomes and is not a forecast of a likely outcome or share price. TPI does not undertake to provide updates to any opinions or views expressed in this document. TPI accepts no liability whatsoever (in negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection with this document (except in respect of wilful default and to the extent that any such liability cannot be excluded by applicable law).  

The information in this document is published solely for information purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. The material contained in the document is general information intended for recipients who understand the risks associated with equity investment in smaller companies. It does not constitute a personal recommendation as defined by the FCA or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual investors nor provide any indication as to whether an investment, a course of action or the associated risks are suitable for the recipient.  

This document is approved and issued by TPI for publication only to UK persons who are authorised persons under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and to professional clients, as defined by Directive 2004/39/EC as set out in the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority. This document may not be published, distributed or transmitted to persons in the United States of America, Japan, Canada or Australia. This document may not be copied or reproduced or re-distributed to any other person or organisation, in whole or in part, without TPIs prior written consent.  

Copyright © 2025 Turner Pope Investments (TPI) Limited, all rights reserved. 

FTSE 100 falls as AI concerns return

The FTSE 100 dropped again on Friday as concerns about AI valuations returned with a vengeance overnight, with Nvidia giving up 6% gains to close negative.

The S&P 500 closed 1.6% lower, and the tech-focused NASDAQ shed 2.2%.

Such heavy selling was difficult for European traders to ignore, and the FTSE 100 lost 0.6% in early trade.

“It seemed, for a while, yesterday that everything was right with the world once again. Nvidia delivered strong earnings on Wednesday, reigniting some enthusiasm around the AI theme, and the September jobs report was a solid-ish one, albeit a report that had a few blots on the copybook under the surface,” explained Michael Brown Senior Research Strategist at Pepperstone.

While the lower start to trade on Friday will be a kick in the teeth for bulls that thought Nvidia had saved the day with a seemingly upbeat earnings report, London’s leading index did pick up from the worst levels as bargain hunters stepped in.

The FTSE 100’s cyclical sectors were heavily hit on Friday. Investors rotated out of miners, engineering firms, and technology-oriented investment trusts.

Babcock was also among the losers despite reporting a very respectable set of half-year results. Babcock shares were down 1.2%, most likely due to wider selling rather than any real disappointment given a 7% jump in revenue and higher profits.

“Babcock’s latest results will make even the most hardened defence investors sit up a little straighter. A 19% jump in first-half operating profit and a 25% dividend hike would be eye-catching in any sector; but in a business better known for long-cycle contracts and cautious guidance, it’s confirmation that Babcock is well and truly firing on all cylinders,” said Mark Crouch, market analyst for eToro.

“The British engineering and defence group has powered down debt, sharpened execution and turned itself into one of the London market’s most consistent outperformers. It helps, of course, that governments are rediscovering the urgency of naval capability. From Danish and Swedish frigate tenders to a Polish submarine partnership with Saab, Babcock is suddenly the name on every northern European admiral’s lips.”

JD Sports was another notable faller, as the decline after yesterday’s trading statement continued. JD is now trading at its lowest levels since July.

Persimmon was the FTSE 100’s top riser, up 2.2%.

ASOS shares fall after another full year loss

ASOS’s fall from grace continues with another year of losses and falling revenues. Once revered as the UK’s leading technology company, ASOS is facing multiple headwinds that are only showing marginal signs of improvement.

ASOS shares were down over 6% on Friday after releasing full-year numbers that revealed a 14% decline in revenue and an adjusted loss before tax of £98m.

“ASOS’s latest results continue to show an uphill battle to execute a turnaround with shares down sharply this morning,” said Adam Vettese, market analyst for investment platform eToro.

“The company missed profit expectations, largely due to subdued consumer demand, reflecting broader economic worries and tighter household budgets. Many customers appear to be delaying purchases, or waiting out for deeper discounts which is a habit ASOS would do well to avoid relapsing into.”

Looking past the disappointing headline numbers, there were some signs of improvement. Gross margins increased to 47.1% from 43.4% and the £98m loss before tax was an improvement on last year’s £126m loss.

“Long-suffering ASOS shareholders will hope that the improvement in gross margins in today’s numbers signals better times ahead,” explained Chris Beauchamp, Chief Market Analyst UK at IG.

“Crucially the firm expects this trend to continue too. While its perhaps not the week to go big on AI, the theme made an appearance in these numbers and might help drive sales. We have seen too many false dawns in ASOS over the years, but perhaps this morning’s numbers mark the start of a recovery back to the highs of a year ago.”

The progress in losses and margins was driven by a focus on higher-value sales and lower discounting. But lower overall sales aren’t anything to cheer about.

Cornish Metals: accelerating towards South Crofty production

The UK Investor Magazine was delighted to welcome Fawzi Hanano, Chief Development Officer at Cornish Metals, to discuss recent progress at their South Crofty tin mine. 

London AIM and Toronto Venture listed Cornish Metals is on a mission to bring mining back to the South Crofty underground tin mine located in Cornwall. The mine closed in 1998 after a 400 year production record.

Simplifying Crypto Payments: How Bitcoin Payment Processors Streamline Transactions for Merchants

A Bitcoin payment processor is a service that assists merchants who are accepting Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, by converting that revenue stream into a clear, predictable cash flow. Rather than manage wallets and blockchain confirmations directly, the business links its website or app to a processor that generates payment details, following transactions on the network, updating order statues. In most cases, the processor also automatically converts incoming crypto into fiat or stablecoins, so a merchant can see its sales in a familiar currency without having to worry about volatility.

For the customer, paying with a Bitcoin payment processor is broadly the same as making a payment by any other online means: they select crypto at checkout, are shown how much crypto to pay and then simply transfer funds from their wallet using a QR code or address. The processor watches the blockchain and when the transaction gets enough confirmations, it replies a simple “paid” or “failed” status to merchant’s system. If something goes awry – perhaps the customer sends too little or too much – the processor can flag the problem and assist in remedying the payment without requiring support to wade through raw transaction data.

The primary service that Bitcoin payment processors provide to merchants is that of a specialized acquiring service for digital assets. It shortens the intermediaries that stand between buyer and seller, thus helping to reduce transaction costs as well as minimize the risk of declines from banks or card networks. Faster settlement, less payment blocking and ability to reach buyers in countries with relatively undeveloped banking systems all add up to a big trigger for successful checkouts. In addition, processors often provide added tools – dashboards, API integration, webhooks and reporting – that give finance and support teams (as well as developers) the ability to track crypto payments with the same kind of clarity and control they have over more traditional methods.

Majedie Investments Quarterly investment review and outlook July to September 2025 

Disclaimers:  

This publication is intended to be of general interest only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, tax, accounting, investment or other advice nor is it an offer to buy or sell shares in the Company (or any other investments mentioned herein).  

Nothing in this publication should be construed as a personal recommendation to invest in the Company (or any other investment mentioned herein) and no assessment has been made as to the suitability of such investments for any investor. In making a decision to invest prospective investors may not rely on the information in this document. Such information is subject to change and does not constitute all the information necessary to adequately evaluate the consequences of investing in the Company.  

The shares in the Company are listed on the London Stock Exchange and their price is affected by supply and demand and is therefore not necessarily the same as the value of the underlying assets. Changes in currency rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value of the Company’s shares (and any income derived from them). Any change in the tax status of the Company could affect the value of the Company’s shares or its ability to provide returns to its investors. Levels and bases of taxation are subject to change and will depend on your personal circumstances. 

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Any return estimates or indications of past performance cited in this document are for information purposes only and can in no way be construed as a guarantee of future performance. No representation or warranty is given as to the performance of the Company’s shares and there is no guarantee that the Company will achieve its investment objective.  


Over the fourth financial quarter, the Net Asset Value (NAV) rose by +7.1%, bringing the return for the year to +8.3%.1  Investment performance is therefore ahead of the run rate implicit in the CPI+4% objective over both the quarter and for Majedie’s financial year as a whole. Returns were driven by bottom-up positions in areas as diverse as Chinese and European equities, specialist credit, and supply-constrained commodities. We believe this combination of nonconsensual fundamental ideas, sourced through our proprietary ideas network, makes Majedie a high-quality, repeatable, and complementary proposition for its shareholders.  

Majedie’s portfolio holdings are marked-to-market regularly; its distinctive ‘liquid endowment’ approach does not include any allocations to private equity, venture capital or other hard-to value illiquid assets.  

With major stock-market indices now fully valued, we believe the most attractive opportunities lie in overlooked international markets, select credit situations, and targeted real assets where structural imbalances exist between supply and demand. 

Market Commentary 

In many respects, the quarter had an old-fashioned feel, with corporate earnings and central banks setting the tone. Most asset classes posted gains: global equities, as measured by the MSCI ACWI, rose +7.3%. 

Emerging markets led the way, as China extended its recovery amid signs that stimulus was gaining traction and policymakers reaffirmed the stock market’s importance as a policy tool. Among developed markets, Japan stood out, advancing on the back of robust GDP growth, a weaker yen and a renewed trade accord that saw US tariffs fall from 25% to 15%. In the United States, most of the progress came from multiple expansion rather than earnings growth. With the S&P 500 now trading at 22x forward earnings, valuations once again appear stretched. Growth stocks (+8.6%) outpaced value (+6.0%), and for once small caps fared well as investors began to anticipate rate cuts. 

Softer US labour and inflation data duly paved the way for a 25bps rate cut in September – the Fed’s first since 2024. Chair Jerome Powell hinted at further easing, albeit data dependent. In the UK, inflation overshot while growth undershot, sending gilt yields to 27-year highs. France’s budget tensions unsettled bond markets despite the ECB lowering its 2025 inflation forecast to 2.1%. 

Credit spreads in developed markets have tightened to multi-year lows, while EM debt and Treasuries gained from the easing trend. Commodities diverged: oil and gas weakened, but gold continued its steady ascent. A softer dollar rounded off the quarter, lending further support to emerging-market currencies. 

The Portfolio and Outlook 

The portfolio is structured with the aim of achieving long-term growth, but returns will depend on market conditions, even as we take a circumspect view of broader markets. The largest constituents of major indices appear expensive and, in our judgement, offer little margin of safety. A generation of investors has grown accustomed to capital gains from the S&P 500 and private equity, sees the US dollar as a one-way trade, and government bonds, or “par” credit, as dependable sources of income and protection. Many portfolios are thus heavily concentrated in these familiar areas. By contrast, the assets we find most attractive remain largely absent from mainstream allocations. Years of under-investment have created scarcity and, with it, opportunity. 

Our most rewarding investments have often come from areas where expectations are depressed and fundamentals improving. In such situations, even modest progress can have an outsized impact, because rising earnings often attract higher valuation multiples. Conversely, when starting valuations are stretched, small disappointments can trigger disproportionate losses. Our experience suggests that, especially at valuation extremes, it is the rate of change in earnings expectations that matters more than their absolute cadence. Today, most opportunities lie in a middle ground: neither so cheap as to ensure success, nor egregiously expensive. That is when discipline counts. Rather than rely on subjective judgements about valuation, we (and our external managers) seek situations where the market is mispricing reality, ideally with an identifiable catalyst to correct the anomaly. 

We have avoided chasing ‘story’ stocks and other speculative assets that bounced back after this year’s tariff-induced volatility, many of which we feel are vulnerable to negative rate-of change. Our investment approach seeks to minimize the risk of permanent capital loss while aiming for returns independent of benchmarks. We prefer bottom-up opportunities in international markets, midcaps and eclectic value situations where fundamentals are improving from a low base. 

Asia: reform and renewal  

Low expectations and improving fundamentals are most evident in Asia. Barely a year ago, many allocators had written off China as ‘un-investable’, convinced they understood the country’s structural challenges better than its own policymakers. Today, the same fickle allocators are increasingly fearful of missing out. China’s authorities have acted to revive domestic demand, curb uneconomic competition (‘involution’) and channel investment toward strategic technologies. The country’s massive build-out of AI infrastructure is viewed less as a business venture than investment in a national utility, designed to raise productivity and social resilience.  We aim to capture this ‘slow bull market’, which appears to be built on sturdier foundations than the liquidity-fuelled rally of 2015.  

Japan remains one of the most compelling reform stories globally. Corporate governance continues to improve, with management teams increasingly responsive to shareholder pressure for efficiency and returns.  

Absolute Return Credit Markets 

Spreads on conventional investment-grade and high-yield debt sit near two-decade lows, meaning investors have seldom been paid less for taking-on the risk of default. Private credit (to which Majedie’s portfolio has no exposure) may promise higher yields but, in our view, in many cases it does not represent true value.  

Our approach to credit is very different. We focus on asymmetric situations where downside should be limited to the recovery of principal, and where upside potential is considerable. Through our longstanding relationships with leading stressed and distressed investors, we seek to capitalise on divergence between the price of credit instruments of differing quality buckets. In US leveraged loans, for example, BB-rated bonds yield only 2.6% more than ‘risk free’ Treasuries of similar duration, whereas spreads on CCC paper are some 12.6%. This differential, twice the level of 2021, creates a very attractive setup for long-short credit managers because it allows them to mitigate market risk inexpensively, while pursuing situation-specific opportunities with higher return potential. 

Real Assets: scarcity over sentiment 

As long-term investors, we like tangible, cash-generating assets, the price of which depends on fundamental supply and demand considerations. This mindset steers us toward copper and uranium, two commodities that are scarce and strategically vital. They both sit at the nexus of global electrification, AI-related energy demand and essential investment in defence infrastructure. 

As for gold, we understand its conceptual appeal and recognise that central banks are building reserves as confidence in the Dollar erodes. However, we have always struggled to make a fundamental case for owning an asset that has neither utility, nor cash flow. Interestingly, the historical link between gold and real interest rates appears to have broken down, perhaps reflecting that speculation may be partly behind the price action this year.  

Summary 

Majedie’s portfolio is built around high-conviction, non-consensual opportunities. In many cases, these can be described as ‘rate-of-change’ situations, where fundamentals are quietly improving but expectations remain low. Just as importantly, we have sought to avoid areas where expectations are so high that even a modest disappointment could be severely punished by the markets.  

Whilst undoubtedly challenging, we believe environments like these often produce the most attractive asymmetry between risk and reward. With major indices now appearing fully valued, the most compelling opportunities lie in overlooked international markets, specialist credit, and real assets where structural imbalances persist. Majedie’s differentiated, bottom-up approach is designed to capture these mispriced situations with discipline and conviction. 

ITM Power secures 710 MW German energy infrastructure deal

ITM Power has landed a significant contract to supply electrolyser technology for two major energy infrastructure projects in Germany.

The deal with Stablegrid Group covers a combined capacity of 710 MW over two projects designed specifically to stabilise the grid.

The projects represent an innovative approach to managing Germany’s increasingly complex electricity grid, with both facilities operating exclusively for grid balancing and smoothing out the mismatches between renewable energy supply and demand.

This “predispatch” system, dubbed “Netzbrücke” or “grid bridge,” aims to dramatically reduce costly grid interventions.

Currently, German taxpayers face annual bills of 2-3 billion Euros due to redispatch operations, according to ITM Power’s update on Friday.

The first project, “Netzbrücke 410,” will see ITM Power deliver a 30 MW green hydrogen production facility in Rüstringen.

The second larger project involves installing 680 MW of indoor electrolyser capacity, with pre-FEED work beginning in January 2026 and a final investment decision expected in 2028.

“Partnering with Stablegrid on these landmark grid balancing projects in Germany reinforces ITM’s position at the forefront of the energy transition in Europe’s largest economy,” said Dennis Schulz, CEO of ITM Power.

GenIP wins new orders from UK and US institutions

GenIP has received 57 new report orders from returning clients. The orders come from two major US research universities and a UK institution.

The AI-powered innovation intelligence company secured 50 Invention Evaluator report orders from two US universities with strong commercialisation track records.

One institution ranks consistently in the National Academy of Inventors’ “Top 100 US Universities Granted Utility Patents”. The other operates one of America’s most active university innovation hubs, tracking thousands of invention disclosures, patent filings and spinoff ventures annually.

A UK university that first engaged GenIP in June 2025 has placed a further seven report orders.

The repeat business validates GenIP’s AI-enabled analytical products in supporting technology transfer decisions, the company said.

Melissa Cruz, GenIP’s CEO, noted the company is seeing increased inbound referrals from universities reporting improvements in licensing workflows after adopting GenIP’s evaluations.

“The continued return of leading institutions reinforces the market’s need for faster, more reliable decision-support in technology commercialization,” said Melissa Cruz, CEO of GenIP.

“We are also seeing a rise in inbound referrals from universities that have reported meaningful improvements in their licensing workflows after adopting our evaluations. This combination of repeat business and organic referrals gives us strong confidence in our growth trajectory as we expand our AI-powered product suite and support more clients globally.”    

The quiet revolution in India’s savings is unfolding not in gold or real estate, but in mutual funds 

Over the past decade, India’s key growth narratives have centred around three pillars: 1) favourable demographics 2) structural reforms and 3) robust digital infrastructure development. One of the positive fallouts of this is the exponential surge in assets of India’s mutual fund sector. 

Transformation of Indian Investment Culture 

 Historically, Indian families preferred investing in traditional assets like gold, real estate, or bank deposits, leaving equity markets predominantly to international investors. This landscape has fundamentally shifted as millions of households now embrace investing in equity, evolving from conservative savers into proactive wealth builders. 

The domestic Mutual Fund industry has experienced significant expansion over last two decades, with Assets Under Management (AUM) multiplying approximately 44 times to reach US$773 billion by March 2025! In the last 5 years itself, it has grown more than 3 times. This tremendous growth stems from sustained capital inflows, currently averaging around  $4 billion monthly, with gross inflows through Systematic Investment Plans (SIP) alone contributing over US$3 billion per month. SIPs represent an investment methodology by which a person can contribute fixed amounts to selected mutual fund schemes on monthly, quarterly, or annual basis, typically spanning six months to several years. 

The corporate equity ownership structure reflects this dramatic transformation. Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI)’s stake at 18.8% in NSE500 companies as of March 2025 is at a decade low, while domestic institutions have reached a record high of 19.2%. In fact, since 2021, domestic institutions have invested over US$192 billion compared to FPIs being net sellers of approximately US$8 billion, highlighting this remarkable reversal. 

Figure 1: Domestic Institutional Equity Flows over the years (US$ bn) 

Catalytic Events and Digital Revolution 

Several pivotal events reshaped this landscape beginning with 2016’s demonetization, which triggered a reallocation of resources from physical to financial assets and led to change in mindset on hoarding cash. Simultaneously, fintech applications emerged during India’s mobile internet expansion, fostering increased digital transaction adoption and confidence. The 2021 COVID-19 lockdowns, combined with elevated savings rates, further accelerated investor migration toward equity markets and mutual funds. 

But a lot of credit should go to active marketing by the industry. Since 2017, the Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) has been carrying out an investor education campaign “Mutual Fund Sahi Hai” (Mutual Fund is the Right Choice). Visibility is high, as AMFI strategically positions its advertisements during the Indian Premier League (IPL). The 2025 edition of IPL had over 1 billion viewers across television and digital platforms. 

AMFI’s comprehensive marketing initiatives encouraged serious SIP consideration among investors. Mutual funds emphasized affordability with entry points as low as Rs500 (£5), enhancing accessibility and adoption. Consequently, SIP contributions have emerged as the primary driver of sustained inflows, growing from approximately US$350 million a month a decade ago to over US$3 billion a month currently. Active SIP accounts have exceeded 95 million, representing 20% of the industry’s total AUM. 

Leading distributors identify liquidity and small ticket sizes as crucial criteria favouring mutual funds over alternative investment options. Retail investors are now looking at investing over a 5–10-year investment horizons, and these are now being looked at akin to an EMI, but for wealth creation. These concepts have resonated with retail investors, resulting in higher mutual fund inflows even during high volatility periods. 


Figure 2: Inflows through Systematic Investment Plans (US$ bn) 

Digital Infrastructure and Democratisation 

The above would not have been possible without the digital revolution which has fundamentally transformed investor behaviour patterns. Tech-savvy younger generations increasingly utilize online platforms and mobile applications for mutual fund investments. User-friendly interfaces have democratized investing, making it accessible to broader population segments, while mutual funds now provide convenient platforms for seamless investment tracking and redemption. 

Reflecting the capital markets’ digital transformation, India’s top three brokers are all online/digital platforms: Groww, Zerodha and Angel One. As digital transactions accelerated, mutual funds expanded distribution networks nationwide, increasing participation from smaller towns and semi-urban areas. 

According to AMFI data, the top 5 cities’ share declined from 62% in 2020 to 52% in 2025, while contribution from towns beyond the top 110 cities increased from 11% to approximately 19% during the same period. This trend demonstrates investment diversification beyond major metropolitan centres, indicating enhanced financial inclusion and investment activity in smaller cities. 

Figure 3: Rising penetration in urban & semi-urban cities 

Is it sustainable? 


The question we often ask ourselves is whether these domestic flows are sustainable? Even after the strong inflows, mutual fund industry’s current AUM-to-GDP ratio stands at just approximately 20% compared to the US at 100%+, indicating ample room for growth. Mutual funds represent only about 12% of Indian household financial assets (March 2025) versus 20%+ in the USA. Going by macroeconomic factors like young demographics, digitally native population, and higher economic growth, these flows look sustainable. 

Notably, mutual fund inflows have demonstrated resilience over the past year despite negative equity returns (-5% for BSE Sensex as of September 30, 2025) and increased volatility from geopolitical disruptions. However, prolonged market consolidation and subdued returns could potentially moderate future flows. 

The three key catalysts for healthcare

Gareth Powell, Head of Healthcare at Polar Capital, explains why he believes sentiment in the healthcare sector may be bottoming out after almost three years of headwinds.

He highlights three key drivers supporting his outlook: strong volume growth, broad new product cycles, and renewed M&A momentum. With US policy concerns easing, valuations near multi-decade lows, and investor interest starting to return, he sees good reason to be optimistic about the potential for a healthcare recovery.

Visit Polar Capital Global Healthcare Trust