Boohoo profits soar despite factory scandal, shares rise
Well-timed Trump revelations might sway the election

Trump taxes, or lack thereof
The first of these revelations was the publication of President Trump’s income taxes by the New York Times on Monday. The reveal, while hardly surprising, puts the incumbent POTUS in something of a logical bind. Either, he accepts that he is a terrible businessman – which his $421 million in loans and debt might corroborate – and therefore not fit to run the largest economy in the world. Or, more likely, his $750 in income tax reveals, much like his famous draft-dodging, that his patriotism is entirely empty rhetoric. While he might blow the horn of US nationalism, and tout ‘America First’, the reality is that the US as a society comes fairly far down on Trump’s priority list – perhaps somewhere behind his $70,000 on hairstyle expenses. The bottom line is this: he relies on the support of Americans who are proud of their country, without having much regard for it himself. And, while public services remain underfunded, and trust in public institutions remains fraught, we must all conclude that Trump himself embodies the very worst part of the elite he so often castigates.Decades of tax information that President Trump has tried to hide from the public provides a detailed view of his business career, revealing huge losses, looming financial threats and a large, contested refund from the IRS. https://t.co/9dMTyjE15c pic.twitter.com/sDkQR56swu
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 29, 2020
Cambridge Analytica scandal – no man of the people, just a man who thinks little of the people
The second, and perhaps more damning revelation, though, was the recent breakthrough on Cambridge Analytica data – and the fact that the 2016 Trump campaign had relied on Cambridge Analytica’s psychographics to shape voter behaviour. While news that the Vote Leave campaign had used Cambridge Analytica’s data services to manipulate voters in a similar way, might have had little impact in the UK, this latest breakthrough might have greater significance in the US for a few reasons.First, psychographics are a dossier of a person’s personality and psyche, built on myriad data about online transactions, interactions and opinions. And, while an Orwellian thought for most, what makes this subject particularly sensitive in the US, is that American citizens don’t yet have the right to access their own psychographics dossier. Therefore, data about who they are is being used to manipulate their decision-making at crucial junctures, by whoever has the money to pay for said data, and they are not even aware of what the data says about them. Secondly, Trump is on record, promising that such tactics had not been used. Not only does such manipulation and control completely contravene – and undermine – much of the rhetoric he has spouted against the Democrats (namely that their policies encroach on people’s freedoms), but perhaps represents one of the most disturbing lies of his presidency. ‘I’m here to protect your freedoms from the clutches of the nasty liberal elite – except I’m even worse’ – or something to that effect. Third, is the timing of this latest revelation. Not only has this scandal broken onto the (at least UK) news cycle just hours out from the first presidential debate – it is also an election scandal, only days out from election day. With all of Trump’s vitriol against postal votes, the potential for legal challenges and the POTUS even threatening to squat in the Whitehouse in the event that the vote doesn’t go his way, the Cambridge Analytica leak by Channel 4 News really should tell voters that he is the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Whether or not swing voters accept these damning breakthroughs, or whether they’ll be seduced by the Trump ‘stitch-up’ narrative, has yet to be seen. However, just hours out from the beginning of the main election coverage, these revelations couldn’t have come at a better time for team Biden, and might prove costly for team Trump.“I think every voter has a right to see this. It’s crazy that we don’t have the right to see this.”@profcarroll asked for Cambridge Analytica to release the information they held about him.
We showed him what we found in the data we obtained from the Trump 2016 campaign. pic.twitter.com/mtoGPWUsLh — Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) September 29, 2020
European progress for Mirada
Income
Clients like the choice of paying upfront for technology and licences or spreading the cost with a Software-as-a-Service type deal. By its nature the first type of revenues is likely to be more lumpy than SaaS, but there tends to be some revenues from this source each year. Those deals also generate recurring maintenance income. The deal with PMO is one with an upfront payment plus income from user licences when customers are signed up. PMO expects subscribers to reach 600,000. That means that there will be licence income over the period that these users are signed up, which will be well past the end of this financial year. Even a few dollars per licence would generate a significant income.Financials
Mirada increased continuing revenues by 13% to $13m in the year to March 2020 and it generated cash. Work was carried out on deployments that should yield growing licence and managed services revenues in the future. Capitalised development spending was $4.3m last year and this was partly financed by the cash generated from operations and the £2.12m raised from the sale of a non-core business. Net debt was $5.1m at the end of March 2021 and a loan from the major shareholder has been extended to November 2021. Lockdown has led to increased consumption and take up of TV services, but there were worries that it could delay the finalisation of contracts. The latest launch in Spain and the previous announcement of a service launch in the US Virgin Islands shows that work has been completed on contracts that were previously won. Interim figures will be published during November. There will be some revenues from the Spanish deal, but there should be a greater contribution in the second half and the following year.Why ESG can be misleading and what can be done to protect ethical investment
According to the Tribe analysis, ESG has become a ‘powerful framework’ for businesses to consider their operational risks by using a shared language, and to provide shareholders and lenders with a gauge of the extent to which companies identify and mitigate against these risks.
However, despite encouraging steps in the right direction, and introducing sustainability vocabulary into corporate discourse, a major problem with ESG data sources is that the consumers are led to believe assertions of ‘sustainability’, ‘responsibility’ and ‘impact’ often provided by a singular piece of publicly available information.
According to Tribe, ‘genuine sustainability’ requires engagement with a business’ products, services and history, and needs to be based on data from multiple sources and specialists. Indeed, if we look at oil and gas blue chip, Shell (although you could pick many), the company posts ESG reports, yet its operations are anything but sustainable or ethical. Indeed, even after undergoing seemingly radical CSR reforms, its operations in Nigeria remain the subject of regular controversy. Between providing funding for munitions to suppress protestors (as declared in US Embassy cables in 2006); to being complicit in a $1.1 billion bribery arrangement in 2011 (as reported by global witness); tax irregularities valued at $1.67 billion between 2004 and 2012 (ActionAid); and 1,010 official oil spills between 2011 and 2018 (Amnesty), One might think of RDS as a prolific offender. What makes Shell so interesting, though, is that their CSR initiatives are often touted as some of the best in the oil industry, and that should give us some sense of why using cheery acronyms, such as ESG, is often misleading. According to Tribe’s statement:“Over the last few years we have seen examples of businesses that would never be recognised as responsible or sustainable, due to certain business practices identified in the impact due diligence process, appearing in active and passively managed funds under an ESG banner across sectors. From the financial sector – a bank getting exemplary scores for governance yet investing billions of dollars into Tar Sands exploration businesses for example, to within the clothing retail sector – where large gaps in data and scrutiny on both the environmental and social impact of production were overlooked.”
“Problems then arise in both hoped-for impact and financial returns. This misrepresentation is misleading to investors and opens them up to the exact risks they were seeking to protect themselves against with a sustainable investment strategy. It is therefore critical investors don’t fall into the trap of taking too much comfort from ESG data’s protective blanket and failing to interrogate a business’ strategy in a more holistic manner.”
The solution Tribe would suggest to this dilemma, would be a greater focus on impact investment. In Tribe’s investments, they focus on businesses working to affect positive change, and they use the UN’s 2015 Sustainable Development Goals as a framework to guide their efforts. Or, as Tickr Co-Founder, Tom McGillicuddy, put it: investing in companies with a business model built around creating a positive impact. Another solution is put forward by the Temple Bar Investment Trust Director, Dr Lesley Sherratt, who suggests that another way to make companies more sustainable is by institutional investors moving the goalposts of what can be considered Responsible Investment. Using this approach, Sherratt appreciates the majority stake that the likes of pension funds and investment trusts have in buying shares, and states that if they were to apply more limited but demanding criteria, then companies would be obliged to change their business models, in order to be eligible for Responsible Investment portfolios.Two Investment Trusts for the UK’s economic recovery
BlackRock Throgmorton Trust
The ‘high-conviction’ BlackRock Throgmorton Trust is managed by Daniel Whitestone who heads up BlackRock’s Emerging Companies team. The Throgmorton Trust seeks out companies ‘with strong management teams, strong and dominant market positions’ as well as those that be classes as ‘disruptors’. Top holdings include companies such Serco Group, YouGov, Dechra Pharmaceuticals, Games Workshop and Gamma Communications. Games Workshop is a particular stand out after the model and games company announced a significant shift to online sales during the COVID-19 lockdown which is likely to help margins on the other side. Gamma Communications is a holding that certainly satisfies the ‘disruptor’ element of the portfolio with its multi channel communications offering. Gamma enjoyed a 12% increase in revenue in the first half. The fund interestingly notes that it uses CFDs to profit from falls in the share prices of companies. This typically higher risk activity can utilise leverage and provide protection against volatility in equity markets. As at 30th June the trust had 3.9% of the portfolio allocated to various short positions. This strategy appears to have paid off with BlackRock Throgmorton Trust up 95.9% over the past 5 years making it one of the best performing UK Small Companies Trusts.
JPMorgan Smaller Companies Investment Trust
The attraction to the JPMorgan Smaller Companies Investment Trust stems largely from the trusts focus on the UK consumer. However, with a backdrop of COVID-19 causing concerns about consumer confidence in the short-term, we see strength in the trusts exposure to specialist consumables.
The trust again holds Games Workshop whose inelastic demand from enthusiasts is unlikely to see any major problems in the near term.
It also holds Future plc, the specialist media company who commands loyal communities of users and readers with titles such as FourFourTwo, Horse & Hound and the official magazines for Xbox and Playstation. Specialist titles such as these provide contextual opportunities for advertisers meaning Future can see step much of the reduction in advertising spend associated with newspapers and more general publications.
Other consumer companies such as Dunelm and Pets at Home also fall into the specialist sector but retail exposure may mean the market asks questions of the shares going forward.
With a 14% discount to NAV, JPMorgan Smaller Companies Investment Trust provides an attractive exposure to growing UK companies that have taken COVID-19 in their stride.
Ferguson shares up 7% as it reinstates dividend
Ferguson response
Speaking on the update, company Chief Executive, Kevin Murphy, commented: “We have delivered a strong performance in 2020, which given the global pandemic has highlighted the resilience of our business model. Early in the crisis we moved decisively to protect the health and wellbeing of our associates while continuing to serve our customers supporting critical infrastructure. We have rapidly adjusted our ways of working to adapt to this new operating reality while taking action to lower the cost base. We have also managed working capital and capital expenditure which alongside the strong profit delivery has led to an excellent cash performance.” And looking towards the future, he added: “[…] It is impossible to predict the future progress of the virus, or its economic impact and we expect the current levels of uncertainty to continue for the foreseeable future. However, the fundamental aspects of our business model remain attractive and since the start of the new financial year Ferguson has generated low single digit revenue growth in the US in flat markets overall. While we remain cautious on the outlook for the year as a whole, the business is in good shape and well prepared to address any further market related disruption.”Investor notes
Following the update, Ferguson shares rallied 6.85% or 508.00p, to 7,924.00p apiece 29/09/20 12:00 GMT. Analysts have a majority ‘Hold’ stance on the company, alongside a 6,541.00p consensus target price, and the Marketbeat community offering a 52.97% ‘Outperform’ rating on the stock. The company has a p/e ratio of 18.45, ahead of the industrials sector average of 11.35.B&M European shares rally 5% as shopper spending sees revenues up 25%
The company added that it expects first half EBITDA to be above the guidance range of £250 million to £270 million, at £285 million.
Other positive news included the opening of nine new B&M UK stores, which after closures brings the number up by one. Similarly, the company said it expects to open 40 to 45 new stores in the UK, most of which will be in the fourth quarter.
B&M European continued, stating that its Heron Foods convenience store chain, had enjoyed like-for-like sales growth, alongside six net new store openings.It added that its Babou stores in France reopened on 11 May 2020, with H1 revenue standing at €156.8 million and a ‘small positive’ EBITDA outturn. Overall, it said 37 stores were trading under the B&M brand at the end of H1.
B&M response
Speaking on the results, Chief Executive, Simon Arora, comments:“Our Group has performed well in the first half. Our business model is proving well-attuned to the evolving needs of customers, given our combination of everyday value across a broad range of product categories being sold at convenient out-of-town locations.
Our people have risen to the many challenges posed by the COVID-19 crisis, not least in serving our customers through a period of high demand, keeping our shelves filled, providing a clean and safe shopping environment, as well as sourcing higher volumes than we had planned. I thank them all for their commitment, hard work and resilience.”


