Santander invests heavily into Ebury
Hiscox give shareholders uncertain company update
Amur Minerals raise funds through share subscription
Workplaces need to be more eco-friendly, study finds
Commercial property agents SavoyStewart.co.uk surveyed 1,644 UK office workers on their opinions towards eco-friendly efforts in the workplace.
Those who took part were asked to score their current office in terms of eco-friendliness. The data reveals an average score of 2.3 out of 5, with 5 being very eco-friendly. The most common eco-friendly incentives used by offices are energy efficient utilities and devices, but only 47% of offices have them. Other incentives include sustainable office stationary, materials and equipment, office challenges and green policies, eco-friendly office design and architectural features and an abundance of plant-life. However, the data reveals that the majority of office workers do not believe enough is being done by their workplace to tackle climate change. Employees spoke exclusively to Savoy Stewart, sharing their opinions on the sustainability levels of their workplace.“As offices house many people for a very large portion of the week, they have a massive impact. And just as important as the green initiatives is the trickle-down effect of, ‘if the company is trying to become more eco-friendly, perhaps I should too’,” Lou Crane, Digital PR and Outreach Manager at Evolved Search, said.
“Unfortunately, though, there are many offices using ‘think before you print’ signatures and that’s it. The agency I work for is reducing single-use plastic and ordering milk in glass bottles from local farms, but I think one of the best incentives is the cycle to work scheme,” Lou Crane continued.
Joe Allen, CCO at First Mile said that “in this day and age, we should be working together to meet sustainability goals, and offices have so many greener alternatives than they used to.”
“At First Mile, we have an office green team focused on implementing new initiatives to help us reduce our impact on the environment. We even have a swap shop cupboard where staff bring in pre-loved clothes and swap them with items that others have brought in,” Joe Allen added. The discussion takes place against a backdrop of Extinction Rebellion protests and a growing awareness of the climate change crisis. Companies have begun to implement eco-friendly policies. Earlier this year, Boots announced that it would aim to remove all plastic bags from stores by 2020. Elsewhere, McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) decided to remove plastic lids from its McFlurry ice cream in all UK restaurants from September.Ryanair shares rise despite low profit guidance
Takeaway.com look to formalize Just Eat Deal
Mothercare set to call in administrators
Cineworld shares provide value despite debt concerns
Three Impact Investing funds supporting positive environmental and social development goals
BlackRock BGF Circular Economy
Working with fund manager Evy Hambro and his team at BlackRock, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation highlighted specific areas of the circular economy, such as addressing the 30% waste of nutrients throughout the value chain, as targets for investment. On Ellen MacArthur Foundation suggestions, the BlackRock team are to undergo a qualification process for a wider strategy that is centred on the tiering of risk that allocates 40% of the fund to the top ten holdings. This ground-breaking approach to structuring a fund based on risktiering is the first time BlackRock have employed such a model. The fund has outlined three categories of companies they have set out to invest in. These are ‘Adopters’, ‘Enablers’ and ‘Beneficiaries’ of the circular economy. Adopters Adopters are those companies that have made a contribution to the circular economy an integral part of their company. An example is Adidas who plan to make 11 million pairs of trainers from recycled plastic from the ocean. Enablers Those companies that facilitate the circular economy through their service. This may be a resale or sharing platform that enables individuals and businesses to keep materials in circulation and avoid waste. Beneficiaries Beneficiary companies stand to benefit from increased activity in the circular economy, for example companies whose existing products benefit from the move away from hard plastics. The fund was launched with $20 million seed assets provided by BlackRock and will now seek further backing from the wider market.FP WHEB Sustainability Fund
The FP WHEB Sustainability Fund employs an unconstrained investment strategy exclusively into global equities with a focus on sustainability challenges. In an unusually transparent approach, the fund disclose their entire list of holdings on their site which reveals they are also investors in Xylem and A.O. Smith Corp but provide exposure to Chinese sustainability through China Everbright. Not only do WHEB focus on the activities of the company, they particular attention to the governance of the company. For example, they encourage the board to be made up of 50% independent non-executive directors. The WHEB fund sets out to directly support the UN’s Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) by focusing on 7 of the 17 goals including Good Health & Well-Being, Clean Water & Sanitisation and Responsible Consumption & Production. WHEB note that as SDGs are designed for governments they are only able to support seven directly and support the other ten through business practices. To illustrate the impact of investing in WHEB, they have created a calculator that displays the positive based on the money invested. An investment of £10,000 in December 2018 would have generated enough renewable energy to power a European house for a year, treat 100k litres of water and recycled two tons of waste materials. WHEB’s selection methodology starts by breaking companies down into four categories based on negative or positive impact of their business. These are Degenerative, Transitioning, Mitigating and Breakthrough. Degenerative and Transitioning companies are excluded from the selection process as they are not creating a positive impact or are actually creating a negative impact on the environment or society. Mitigating and Breakthrough categorised companies are eligible for the WHEB fund as they provide a positive impact whilst creating economic value for shareholders. These companies are ranked via a WHEB quality score that focuses primarily on the competitiveness of the company.Jupiter Ecology Fund
The Jupiter Ecology Funds invests 70% of its assets directly in companies that are focused sustainability projects and 30% in other companies. The top ten holding include Xylem, Tomra, Azbil Corp, A.O. Smith Corp and Waste Connections. In their most recent update to investors, the best performing companies in the fund included Tomra and Casella Waste Services. Norway-based Tomra is focused on resource management and provides solution to the food, mining and recycling industries and is a likely a constituent of many ethical and impact investment funds. However, despite being an ecology focussed fund, there is exposure to industrial companies such Johnson Matthey that may not immediately fall into one’s thoughts when looking for sustainable companies. This is because while the company is involved in manufacture of catalytic converters, they engage in a significant level of recycling in their supply chain. The fund has been managed by Charlie Thomas since 2003 and in the 5 years to 31st March 2019 the fund had returned 41.6%.Trump Twittering, trade war trickery and banking sector spooking FTSE
“Suffering a mid-morning scare, the markets ended up sinking into the red as Thursday progressed, unaided by Donald Trump’s latest attack on the Fed’s Jerome Powell.”
“After a calm start, China jumped out of a bush screaming boo at the markets on Thursday morning, with Bloomberg reporting that Beijing had cast doubt on a long-term trade deal with the US despite the imminent completion of ‘phase one’ of the agreement.”
“The markets did bounce back from those losses somewhat, lifted by Trump claiming he and Xi Jinping will be signing ‘phase one’ soon”
China and the USA are working on selecting a new site for signing of Phase One of Trade Agreement, about 60% of total deal, after APEC in Chile was canceled do to unrelated circumstances. The new location will be announced soon. President Xi and President Trump will do signing!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 31 October 2019
These strides were then almost undone as quickly as they were made, “as the President started shouting on Twitter about the Fed getting everything wrong.”
People are VERY disappointed in Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve. The Fed has called it wrong from the beginning, too fast, too slow. They even tightened in the beginning. Others are running circles around them and laughing all the way to the bank. Dollar & Rates are hurting…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 31 October 2019
….our manufacturers. We should have lower interest rates than Germany, Japan and all others. We are now, by far, the biggest and strongest Country, but the Fed puts us at a competitive disadvantage. China is not our problem, the Federal Reserve is! We will win anyway.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 31 October 2019
“The Eurozone indices, which were seriously hurt by the initial reports from China, saw the best of it, the DAX and CAC settling into some very mild losses. The FTSE and Dow Jones weren’t so lucky.”
“The Dow found itself teetering back at the edge of 27000 as it lost 180 points, upset by an unpleasant Chicago PMI that unexpectedly fell to a terribly low 43.2 against the 48.4 forecast and the 47.1 seen last month. That comes after a similarly worrisome pair of PMIs out of China overnight.”
“The FTSE was under fire on all sides. Its banking sector remained in disarray as Lloyds Banking Group (LON: LLOY) became the latest financial firm to disappoint, while its commodity stocks were shaken by the global manufacturing slowdown, trade deal doubts and falling profits at Shell (LON: RDSA).”
Elsewhere in the banking sector, Deutsche Bank (ETR: DBK) reported losses during the third quarter.“To make matters worse, the pound continued to rise against the dollar and the euro, up 0.3% against both. That’s due to a mix of region-specific weaknesses for its rival currencies, alongside the frankly naïve idea December’s general election will yield clarity, not chaos.”
