SSP Group expects UK 86% sales decline, European sales remain strong
Cineworld – three monsters standing in the way of the cinema’s recovery
Not able to get people to the box office
First, Mr Barnick points to cinema attendance, limited by both health and safety, and a shortage of big releases by film studios. On the former concern, Barnick stated that with cinemas being constrained by a two-metre social distancing rule, they would only be able to achieve 30% of their maximum capacity. With a one-metre rule in place, they can fill up to half their pre-Covid max capacity levels. However, he also thinks that constraints won’t actually be a huge issue, as average capacity utilisation pre-pandemic was below 20%, and up to 65-70% at peak times. As far as sentiment for cinema reopenings is concerned, a US poll indicated that 33% of people were willing to return to cinemas instantly, while up to 45% said they were slightly hesitant, and 25% said they were too anxious to even consider the idea. With this in mind, having 30-50% of capacity available will likely mean cinemas are able to cater to whatever demand there is. The bigger issue facing attendance, however, is the slim pickings for the 2020 release slate. With Wonderwoman having been postponed for the sixth time the week before last, Top Gun pushed back until 2021 and the Avatar sequel being moved from 2021 to 2022, Barnick thinks the slate could be down 40-45%, which will inevitably damage attendance. The exhibitor reopening schedule intentionally coincided with the launch of Tenet, and while Cineworld and its peers might also benefit from the launch of family film, Soul, in November, the pipeline for the rest of 2020 is fairly blank – meaning there will be few chances to generate momentum going into 2021. As far as geographical disparity in box office recovery is concerned, Barnick says the main disparity is when cinemas reopened, with mainland European cinemas starting up before their UK and US counterparts. While showing primarily old releases, German cinemas began their recovery earlier than their UK equivalents, which does little for Cineworld, seeing as most of their sites are in the UK and US.Cash, or lack thereof
Cineworld’s second dilemma, much like any cinema at the moment, is its shortage of cash and ample debt. The issue here is that rather than declining, costs are actually likely to rise going forwards. First, and less inevitably, because cinemas might invest in new ways to add value to the cinema experience versus online viewing. Then secondly, and more inevitably, cinemas will have to invest in expanding their cleaning and hygiene practices, with more regular cleaning procedures likely to impact a company’s cost line. The main issue as far as cash is concerned, though, is the lack of potential to sell parts of the Cineworld portfolio in order to increase liquidity. The reason for this is that most of the US Cineworld (Regal) estate has already undergone a ‘fairly aggressive’ sale and lease-back agreement drive in order to increase liquidity. In the UK, the majority of the company’s sites are leasehold, and therefore cash generating potential is limited. Despite the lack of opportunity to generate new cash from its sites, though, the company might still opt to save cash by reducing the size of its estate, with Barnick anticipating that Cineworld might reduce its UK estate by 10-15%. The key issue as far as cinema sites is concerned, he says, is the risk of previously-growing independent operators folding. From an M&A perspective, Barnick thinks that, driven by the recent abolition of the Paramount Consent Decrees, streaming services like Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) might be interested in picking up the estates of ailing independent exhibitors via bolt-on acquisitions. The reason they’d do this is to diversify their distribution streams and attract high profile filmmakers, who previously might have resisted releasing new films directly onto an online streaming service. Should such developments come to fruition, online services would not only compete with the cinema industry, but would compete with pureplay cinemas, for the cinema industry.(Online) content is king
The third major concern for cinemas like Cineworld is the seemingly unstoppable rise of premium video on demand (PVOD), with not only streaming sites such as Amazon and Netflix, but studios starting their own PVOD platforms, such as Disney Plus. The rise of these PVOD platforms are accompanied by two key concerns. First, that studios such as Disney (NYSE:DIS) forgo theatre releases, and attract people towards their services by reserving high profile releases exclusively for their users. This has been seen with the revival of Mulan skipping cinema screens and being released directly onto Disney Plus, as well as previously adored franchises – such as Star Wars and Lord of the Rings – being taken away from the big screen and turned into rolling series formats on Disney Plus and Amazon Prime respectively. The second structural concern is the shortening of the theatrical window. While Disney has somewhat ironically said they’ll respect the theatrical window, the AMC-Universal deal will see the window shortened from 75-90 days, to just 17 days. This massive gouge out of films being reserved for cinema viewership presents the real possibility of seismically changing the way we consume film content. By shortening the theatrical window to such an extent, cinemas will have to find a way of stopping people from thinking, ‘well, we’ll get it online in two-ish weeks’.The Cineworld outlook
How much these considerations will effect the upcoming Cineworld results is pretty self-intuitive. With Barnick stating that UK cinemas are expecting a market-wide reduction of 45-50% in attendance year-on-year – from 170 million in 2019, to between 80-100 million in 2020 – and lockdown only pumping up the POVD boom, he says the outlook for the remainder of 2020 is ‘pretty bleak’. As far as investors are concerned, the Cineworld debt load and efforts to save cash means they are unlikely to reinstate their dividend, having initially cancelled it back in April. One positive note to finish on, is that 2020 was already expected to be a fairly muted year as far as big releases were concerned. Also, with all things being well, the release of the new James Bond title could provide a revenue boost and string momentum going into 2021, and a year of better things to come (we hope). To see the full interview with Harry Barnick, take a look at our Cineworld podcast.FTSE on top as global equities lick their wounds after pandemic panic
Beazley shares lead FTSE 250 fallers as it doubles Covid insurance claims estimate
With the bulk of Beazley’s business coming by way of US and UK-based conferences, and with most events being called off due to restrictions, the company has increased its loss estimates, with further further claims anticipated based on its exposure for events in 2021.
Due to these factors, the company said that its total estimate for first party Covid claims has been moved from US$170m to US$340m net of reinsurance, with Beazley attributing all of this increase to further event cancellations.
The company added that this revised estimate assumes that some semblance of normality will resume in the second half of 2021, though if this is not the case, it estimates it could add a further US$50 million of further claims net of reinsurance.Beazley keeps a brave face
Speaking on the company’s forward-looking opportunities, its Statement read:“We continue to see improving growth prospects across our portfolios of business. This is primarily driven by continuing rate improvements, with an overall rate change of 13% at the end of August. We estimate that the overall growth for 2020 will be in the mid-teens.”
“Looking towards next year we expect these rate improvements to continue, and are again planning for double digit growth in 2021. We have contemplated this growth within our capital planning and, following the equity raise and LOC extension earlier this year, are able to take full advantage of the opportunity that lies ahead of us.”
“Investments returned US$136m (or 2.2%) up to the end of August. Whilst we have benefited from recent improvements in investment markets, we remain relatively cautious on taking investment risk given the continued uncertainty surrounding the global economy.”
Investor notes
Following the announcement, Beazley shares dipped by 10.87% or 42.40p, to 347.60p a share 22/09/20 11:30 GMT. This is ahead of the company’s year-to-date nadir of 323.00p, but well short of analysts’ median 12-month price target of 501.68p. The current price is also more than 42% below the company’s share price on the same day last year. Beazley currently has a p/e ratio of 11.21 and a dividend yield of 3.49%.Billington shares slip as profits fall 77% and it cancels its dividend
Billington response
Commenting on a difficult period of trading, company CEO, Mark Smith, said:“Following an exceptional 2019, the first half of the year has been dominated by the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the construction sector and the consequential restrictions on site access, project delays and cancellations.”
“We have seen a significant impact on our first half revenue, however with all Group operations having now returned to near full capacity and with the majority of projects having restarted, we look forward to the remainder of the year with cautious optimism. We anticipate improved Group financial performance in the second half of the year, before hopefully moving to more normal trading conditions in 2021 assuming the economy stabilises and commences its recovery from the pandemic.”
Investor notes
Following the announcement, Billington shares took a chunk out of their 10% Monday rally, falling 6.35% or 20.00p, to 295.00p 22/09/20 10:20 BST. It currently has a 59.28% ‘outperform’ rating set by a poll of Marketbeat‘s community, with 115 votes for ‘outperform’ and 79 for ‘underperform’. It has a p/e ratio of 7.91, which means it is trading at a less expensive rate than most of its industrial sector products peers, who have an average p/e ratio of 21.06.Global equities post mild rebound on Tuesday morning
“Two Tuesday updates captured the varying fortunes of UK firms on a sector-by-sector basis. Whitbread – which covers not one, but two badly hit areas with its hotel and restaurant chains – revealed it was cutting 6000 jobs after an 80% first half drop in sales. Investors sent the stock 3% lower in response.”
“In contrast, B&Q-owner Kingfisher blasted past first half forecasts, posting a 23% surge in adjusted pre-tax profit to £415 million – £36 million more than analysts had estimated – as like-for-like sales aggressively rebounded in Q2, climbing 19.5% after a 24.8% contraction in Q1. Crucially that momentum also has carried into Q3 (to date), with LFLs up 16.6%. This as UK customers were drawn to DIY for a variety of reasons, from turning the home into an office and/or classroom, to simply finding something to do. With investors understandably impressed by Kingfisher’s handiwork, the stock jumped close to 7%.”
Elsewhere in global equities, the Dow Jones clawed back some its 800 point decline but nonetheless closed at minus 500 points on Monday night. Prospects of these losses being recouped are also slim, with futures suggesting a flat open for the US index. Also, having been more subdued in their losses on Monday, Asian markets remained in the red on Tuesday, with the SSE Composite falling 1.29%, to 3,274 points, and the Hang Seng dropping 0.98%, to 23,716. Meanwhile, Japan’s TOPIX posted another morning of gains, up 0.49% to 1,646 points.
