.@NatashaBertaud: “@JunckerEU stressed that the Withdrawal Agreement must have a legally operational solution – not arrangements to be developed and agreed in the transition period.”
— Daniel Ferrie (@DanielFerrie) October 3, 2019
“This solution must meet all the objectives of the backstop: preventing a hard border, preserving North-South cooperation and the all-island economy, and protecting the EU’s Single Market and Ireland’s place in it.”
— Daniel Ferrie (@DanielFerrie) October 3, 2019
“President @JunckerEU will speak to Taoiseach @LeoVaradkar this afternoon and will reiterate the EU’s continued unity and solidarity behind Ireland.”
— Daniel Ferrie (@DanielFerrie) October 3, 2019
These updates followed a phone call between Boris Johnson and Jean-Claude Juncker, in which the EC president said he was pleased the UK was making steps toward attempting to find a compromise. Similarly, the Brexit ‘Spartans’ among the Conservative party and some members of the Northern Irish Parliament’s lower house have a positive outlook following Johnson’s latest proposal.“There are problematic points in the UK’s proposal and further work is needed. This work is for the UK to do, not the other way around.”#Brexit
— Daniel Ferrie (@DanielFerrie) October 3, 2019
However, Corbyn went on to echo the concerns of Northern Irish businesses, which were bolstered by the reaction of the Irish media. The Irish Times began, “The latest UK proposals on Brexit reflect either an extraordinary ignorance of Northern Ireland or a willingness to risk the Belfast Agreement – and the progress of the last 20 years – to further the Johnson government’s political interests.” “The need to minimise the inevitable problems caused by a customs border on the island of Ireland is presented as a technical issue when, of course, it is so much more. The contortions necessary to keep the [DUP] on side have created proposals which would be disastrous for the North’s economy and bring with it wider dangers to peace …” “While claiming to support the Belfast agreement, the Johnson government is showing a wilful disregard for it and for the commitments the UK made in negotiations with the EU in December 2017. The most credible conclusion is that the prime minister and those around him have anticipated that this offer will be rejected and their primary objective in framing it in such a manner is their own domestic political advantage.” The Irish Independent continued, “Mr Johnson has argued the backstop is “a bridge to nowhere”. Alas, the slight proposals set down yesterday look like a flimsy pontoon that could be washed away in the first tides of trouble.” “They require stronger foundations to either protect the legacy of the Good Friday agreement, or seal the single market. They are more an outline than a detailed plan …” “Commitments cannot be exchanged for vague possibilities. The Brexiteers fear the UK could be trapped indefinitely in limbo, but they have no problem inviting the same plight on the North. Rejection of the latest Brexit plan may lead to the no deal Mr Johnson warned of.” “But acceptance could have the same negative outcomes. The British prime minister claims his plan is reasonable. But the risks appear weighed too heavily on one side.” The latter sentiments were echoed by Leo Varadkar, who made it clear he was unwilling to undermine a legally binding agreement of such political and cultural importance, for the sake of a promise and a set of outlined proposals. Speaking on Boris Johnson’s attempt to sidestep the border-shaped elephant in the room – with designated checkpoints away from the North-Republic border itself – Irish TD Thomas Byrne stated,Irish junior minister Patrick O’Donovan tells RTE the UK proposal is it not the basis of a deal, but is ‘certainly the basis for further discussions’ adding ‘there are some things that we would welcome, but some things we would have issue with.’
— JPCampbellBiz (@JP_Biz) October 3, 2019
