“I’m not a bull, but I’m very conscious of the market’s ability to bounce back.”Looking forward, Vanguard representatives said that they expected Trump’s hawkishness to persist and that Jay Powell would likely be forced into further accommodative monetary policy. Regarding the inverted yield curve, the consensus was that the Fed needed to continue its rate cuts, with the hope that developing markets would follow suit. The Company remained optimistic and highlighted potentially fruitful leads for investors to pursue. Discussed as almost a given, there was a bullish long-term outlook for gold, and for more proactive investors, Mr Lakha advised looking into deep-out-of-money-puts on a two-month rollover. Other market and macro financial news has come from; the London Stock Exchange Group (LON: LSE) and Sterling.
Market and Currency Outlook with Spreadex and Vanguard Capital
Glencore earnings drop by a third and EPS dive 89%
Glencore comments
Chief Executive Officer, Ivan Glasenberg, commented, “Our performance in the first half reflected a challenging economic backdrop for our commodity mix, as well as operating and cost setbacks within our ramp-up/development assets. Adjusted EBITDA declined 32% to $5.6 billion.” “[Our] African copper business did not meet expected operational performance. We have moved to address the challenges at Katanga and Mopani with several management changes as well as overseeing a detailed operational review, targeting multiple improvements to achieve consistent, cost-efficient production at design capacity. Our teams have identified a credible roadmap towards delivering on the significant cashflow generation potential of these assets, at targeted steady state production levels. At Mutanda, we are planning to transition the operation to temporary care and maintenance by year end, reflecting its reduced economic viability in the current market environment, primarily in response to low cobalt prices. We continue to progress studies on the sulphide project, having the potential to extend operations for many years, and anticipate being able to provide an update at our Investor Day in December.” “Looking ahead, we are confident that commodity fundamentals will move in our favour and that our diverse commodity portfolio will continue to play a key role in global growth and the transition to a low-carbon economy. Our asset teams are focused on delivering the full potential of our business, which together with our promising range of commodities, should see us well positioned for the future. Through continued constructive collaboration, we remain focused on creating sustainable long-term value for all stakeholders.”Investor notes
After a slight recovery, the Company’s shares are down 1.75% or 4.05p to 227.30p a share 07/08/19 11:01 BST. UBS analysts remain unchanged in their ‘Hold’ stance, while Deutsche Bank reiterated their ‘Buy’ rating for Glencore stock. Elsewhere in the mining and minerals sector, recent updates have come from; Jubilee Metals Group PLC (LON: JLP), Cora Gold Limited (LON: CORA), Kavango Resources PLC (LON: KAV), Ariana Resources plc (LON: AUU), Rio Tinto plc (LON: RIO) and Bushveld Minerals Limited (LON: BMN).President Energy posts sales and production growth
President Energy comments
Peter Levine, Chairman, stated,
“President has delivered positive results in H1, notwithstanding the headwinds as previously announced which should now, step by step, be receding in the rear-view mirror.”
“In the space of only some 20 months President has enjoyed a period of transformative progress including the successful integration of four valuable acquisitions, a strategic pan-regional pipeline, the bringing on of new production, generation of positive cash flow and attaining good margins. Despite this, President’s share price, uncoupled from such progress, has dropped some 35% in value during that time.”
“President, remains confident as to its future prospects and success as an energy business and is examining initiatives to deliver value for shareholders.”
Investor notes
After rallying healthily, the Company’s surge was mooted and their shares are currently up modestly by 0.76% or 0.050p to 6.60p a share. Analysts from Peel Hunt have reiterated their ‘Add’ stance on President Energy stock. The Group’s p/e ratio is 796.22 and their dividend yield is currently unavailable. Elsewhere in the oil and gas sector, there have been updates from; Mosman Oil and Gas Limited (AIM: MSMN), Nostrum Oil and Gas PLC(LON: NOG), Reabold Resources PLC (LON: RBD) and Trinity Exploration and Production PLC (LON: TRIN).SDL shares rally on 53% increase in H1 operating profits
SDL comments
Adolfo Hernandez, Company CEO , said,
“We are pleased to have delivered a good start to the year, which resulted in a 14% increase in adjusted diluted EPS over the prior year, benefiting from the acquisition of DLS and strong growth in key areas such as premium services and machine translation. During the first half, we continued to deliver on our transformation strategy, including the roll out of our automation programme, Helix, and completed the development of our next generation end-to-end translation platform, SDL Language Cloud, ahead of its launch in September. We enter the traditionally stronger second half with good sales momentum and a healthy sales pipeline. This, alongside the actions that we are taking on productivity, gives us confidence of delivering improved profitability for the full year, in line with management expectations.”
Investor notes
Following the update, the Company’s shares rallied 11.11% or 49.00p, to 490.00p a share. Peel Hunt reiterated their ‘Buy’ stance on SDL stock, having upgraded their stance at the start of August. Their p/e ratio was 17.85 and the dividend yield is 1.43%. Elsewhere in the tech sector, there were updates from; Dialight Plc (LON: DIA), Seeing Machines (LON: SEE), Bidstack Group PLC (AIM: BIDS), Nektan PLC (LON: NKTN) and Keywords Studios PLC (LON: KWS).US labels China ‘currency manipulator’ but receives little sympathy
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js Responding to yesterday’s currency movement, the US Treasury stated, “China has a long history of facilitating an undervalued currency through protracted, large-scale intervention in the foreign exchange market. “In recent days, China has taken concrete steps to devalue its currency, while maintaining substantial foreign exchange reserves despite active use of such tools in the past.” Through the course of trading yesterday, Chinese currency recovered to regular form at over 7 against the dollar, having dipped as low as 6.92 – the lowest rate seen in a decade. Today, US officials will go to the IMF to discuss potential reactionary and counteractive measures to China’s rehashed market mechanism. As it stands, any hope of a resolution to the drawn-out trade tensions seems as distant as it did some 18 months as the first round of – largely superficial – trade talks broke down.China is intent on continuing to receive the hundreds of Billions of Dollars they have been taking from the U.S. with unfair trade practices and currency manipulation. So one-sided, it should have been stopped many years ago!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 5, 2019
No sympathy for the US as China plays its Trump card
As stated, downwardly setting the renminbi (or Yuan) rate has been China’s go-to weapon of choice when attempting to exert its will on the market. However, the market’s reaction has not been, as we might have expected, a prolonged period of lamenting China. Of course, in the post-2008 crash epoch, markets went from being forward discounting to more present-day reactive, so with China’s denial of the US’s ‘currency manipulator’ accusations today, markets are quickly steadying from yesterday’s plunge. More surprising, maybe, is the reaction of the international community. Naturally, Chinese officials attributed yesterday’s currency movement to market-driven forces led by US aggression. Former Chinese foreign exchange regulator, Guan Tao, commented, “The renminbi’s depreciation through seven to the dollar was a market move, not a government target […] It is a result of what the US government has done [during the trade war] not what the Chinese government has done.” Zhang Ming, from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, added, “The renminbi is depreciating mainly because of market pressures related to the trade war, disappointing second-quarter economic data and the [Chinese] government’s crackdown on domestic financial risks.” Chinese commentators argue that the renminbi would have moved more had the Chinese government not been proactive about rate setting. The surprise, perhaps, is that international observers – the IMF included – are sympathetic to this view. As such, Trump is unlikely to receive a supportive pat on the head when he brings his complaints to the IMF today. In the IMF’s last review of the Chinese economy in July 2018, its staff argued that, “the renminbi remains broadly in line with fundamentals,” its also, “welcomed the increase in the flexibility of China’s exchange rate, which should continue”. The People’s Bank of China have a more old-fashioned approach to its currency than most Western countries, favouring a system of stringent management more akin (at least in the fact that it favours intervention and control) to the Gold Standard system, as opposed to the Western model of floating exchange rates. To avoid a currency sell-off similar in fashion to Turkey last year, it is expected that the PBoC will continue to tightly manage the renminbi. Wang Tao of UBS, commented, “The [renminbi] could come back below seven before breaching it again,” “We expect the PBoC to tightly manage exchange rate expectations and prevent [the renminbi] from depreciating significantly.”Outlook
Plainly, the tensions will likely get worse before they get better. This isn’t to say that there will be a perpetual escalation; rather a continued mutual awkwardness and back-and-forth of displays of aggression that will continue to dampen investor sentiments. That being said, backing down would be deadly for either side – but equally neither side can afford to escalate the conflict exponentially. Ironically, both sides are reliant on one-another (China for tax revenue and employment from US firms based in China, and the US on Chinese goods and labour). Other market and macro financial news has come from; the London Stock Exchange Group(LON: LSE) and Sterling.Boohoo shares rally on potential Karen Millen acquisition
Comments on Boohoo acquisition of Karen Millen
Richard Lim, chief executive of Retail Economics, said pre-pack administration allows buyers, “to dispose of the parts of the business that they deem unprofitable”. “In the case of Boohoo, they are looking at value in the online proposition of Karen Millen, and they probably prefer to pick it up as a pre-pack, which will enable them to dispense of the physical stores,” He continued, “It is well known Karen Millen has been struggling in the past few years. But Boohoo will look at it and see another potential revenue stream. “Karen Millen is a different customer segmentation for them, but one that I think could flourish as an online-only proposition. Boohoo will use all the expertise they have acquired in recent years using social media, and bring the brand to a newer audience.”Investor notes
The Company’s shares are up 3.52% or 8.10p to 238.20p a share 06/08/19 12:22 BST. Analysts from Peel Hunt and Liberum Capital reiterated their respective ‘Buy’ stances on Boohoo stock. The Group’s p/e ratio is 54.40 and their dividend yield is currently not available. Elsewhere in retail and on the highstreet, there have been updates from; Burberry Group plc (LON: BRBY), Associated British Foods plc (LON: ABF), H&M (STO: HM-B), Sports Direct International Plc (LON: SPD), and Superdry (LON: SDRY).Yuan drops to lowest dollar comparison in a decade, trade war re-escalates
“The financial markets got a Trump thumping on Friday morning, the European indices left reeling by the President’s shock – but not that shocking – escalation of the trade war with China.”
“Investors probably should have been prepared for this kind of move from the US considering Trump’s negotiations-tanking Twitter rant earlier in the week. The bellicose leader announced that, if a deal can’t be struck between the two superpowers, a fresh $300 billion of Chinese imports would be slapped with a 10% tariff as of September 1st. This on top of those goods already being penalised.”
“Just as it had picked itself up after its post-Fed overreaction, the Dow Jones received a swift kick to the gut, dropping around 300 points to sit at its worst price in over 2 months. Of course, this sparked a round of losses in Asia, including a 2%-plus slide from the Nikkei and a 1.4% drop from the Shanghai Composite, and set the stage for a gory European open.”
Following a week with the Dow diving and the Fed failing to properly address the bond market’s inverted yield curve, China compounded the woes of the global market sentiment with its first salvo. The People’s Bank of China set its daily reference rate for the Yuan at 6.92 (against the dollar), with the bracket for movement being only 2%. This is symbolic, as the 7 threshold hadn’t been passed since the crash in 2008, and the currency only moved over the threshold to 7.03 around midday on Monday. China said the ‘weakness’ was a direct result of trade protectionism and new tariffs placed on Chinese goods. Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone Group, said that the move was a ‘statement of intent’ from China, and would prompt fears about capital flight from China, alongside potential further financial restrictions in the Chinese economy.
